I strongly suggest you reconsider your life choices.
This is not ethical practice.
(is it even practice?)
its intended purely to generate traffic, using with elementary one- or two- sentences paragraphs – yet still uncited – written with a tone chosen by algorithms to maximize the selling potential of words that, for you, have lost all meaning.
minimum commitment and maximum extraction of money.
One person asked a question on yhe topic, responsibly engaging, and you didn't care to answer.
this is corporate shilling. commodified medical science dispensed with illusions using manipulative techniques.
go very nearly 180° and you'll find both ethics and science.
Thanks for sharing this!
Thanks Raj
I strongly suggest you reconsider your life choices.
This is not ethical practice.
(is it even practice?)
its intended purely to generate traffic, using with elementary one- or two- sentences paragraphs – yet still uncited – written with a tone chosen by algorithms to maximize the selling potential of words that, for you, have lost all meaning.
minimum commitment and maximum extraction of money.
One person asked a question on yhe topic, responsibly engaging, and you didn't care to answer.
this is corporate shilling. commodified medical science dispensed with illusions using manipulative techniques.
go very nearly 180° and you'll find both ethics and science.
What are your thoughts on the "zinc taste test"? I've seen it administered with a range of responses from nothing to snap the head back revoltion.